Over 59533

Logic Politics

SPOCK FOR PRESIDENT - As a former Starfleet Science Officer I can offer scientific and logical solutions to the problems we now face

TAGS: spock presodent science logical solutions
Rating: 4.93/5

More politifakes by Budog

RonaldReagan - January 12, 2014, 2:26 pm
Funny. Nimoy would actually work.

you mean to tell me -


LIBERAL LOGIC - Kinda like Circular logic (minus the logic part)

TAGS: liblogic
Rating: 4.52/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 17, 2012, 9:38 pm
its the blueprint for a lot of hacks here!
funnyguy88 - October 17, 2012, 12:34 pm
I love it !! nice work Galt.

More Liberal Logic Gone Wild -

TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 4.82/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 1:18 pm
Repeating the lie does not make it true. but liberals hate the truth it stands in the way of the agenda.
birddseedd - August 28, 2014, 5:25 pm
That poster is very inaccurate. very inaccurate.
JGalt - August 27, 2014, 12:39 am
Zeitguy - August 26, 2014, 12:56 am
A true display of the idiocracy of political pundintsy.

OBAMA SUPPORTER - 140 Pounds of Pure Unadulterated Emotion. Not an Ounce of Logic.

TAGS: obama supporter obamabots emo no logic
Rating: 3.91/5

More politifakes by GrouchoMarxist

RonaldReagan - January 9, 2014, 5:44 pm
Obummer. Look at those arms. They don't have a gym at the Whitehouse?

liberal logic -

Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -

IF GUNS CAUSE CRIME - Do wedding rings cause spousal abuse?

TAGS: lib logic fail
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by JGalt

RonaldReagan - July 19, 2015, 2:25 am
The bump on the back of my head after too many trips to wrong website when she walks by could attest to this

WIND TURBINES - they're such a blight on the landscape

TAGS: illogical rhetoric from the hypocright
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

Renza - February 25, 2013, 11:26 am
I blame the fact that they typically don't use facts for their arguments.
crankyhead - February 24, 2013, 2:55 pm
Yep, there's quite a few easily dismantled arguments coming from the anti-environmentalists these days.
Cyberhagen - February 24, 2013, 12:29 pm
Yeah, I never quite understood that argument. It's like my wife who doesn't want satellite TV because of that "ugly dish"; yet she had no issue growing up with the old TV antennae on everyone's roof?

Liberal Logic -

TAGS: liberal logic confederate flag jay carney soviet propaganda posters communist dukes of hazzard racism bigotry hypocrisy
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

DebtToAmerica - July 3, 2015, 3:34 am
the confederate flag is being a**ociated with racism because racism is indefensible, and they cant allow the people to have a well-known symbol of rebellion against government. soviet propaganda on the other hand fits very well with the current regime

LIBERALS - Sunspot activity is directly related to global temperature cycles. Next please explain how C02 emmissions on Earth affect sunspot activity. Thanks

LIBERAL LOGIC 101 - guns kill people, spoons make you fat, hard-working people are greedy, etc

LIBERAL LOGIC - Defies Reasoning

TAGS: lib logic fail
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by JGalt

crankyhead - November 19, 2012, 5:19 pm
Well, JG, you're the guy who brought up Brad Pitt, so, there's always that, right?
JGalt - November 19, 2012, 7:01 am
only one brad pitt- gee how does it feel when someone puts words in your mouth for a change! you do it all the time to other...hmmm
crankyhead - November 19, 2012, 12:40 am
Those are your words and thoughts JG, they aren't mine.
JGalt - November 19, 2012, 12:35 am
JGalt - November 19, 2012, 12:35 am
Brad Pitt does not turn me on like he does you!
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
How many succesful CFO's are there in the world JG? There's only one Brad Pitt. Just sayin'.
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 8:53 pm
Gee Crankykopf, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bain_Capital sounds like more of a success than failure- not which you describe.... leave it to liberals to amplify the minutia.
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 8:42 pm
you played into my hands cracky! When a CFO can deliver the sales/marketing and performance, isn't it the same thing? OH NO, its probably not... lets hear it from the left the loony logic of how corporate America does not deserve Hollyweird pay scales.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:37 pm
... other reason than this?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:36 pm
Sure, Bain had some successes. They also have a track record of purchasing companies they had no intention of saving, giving themselves enormous payouts, and then putting people out of work. Do you really think that Romney lost the election for any...
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:34 pm
Check out the pay structure at Hostess then tell me if it's the union or the executives who are bankrupting it.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 3:33 pm
Can your brother put b***s in the seats the same way that Brad Pitt does? No. Can your brotehers appearance on a screen guarantee that the theatre will generate enough revenue to pay it's staffs wages? No.
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:45 pm
selective outrage from the left! Hmmmm
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:44 pm
in 1-2 minutes of film where Some of the big name actors make several thousand times more per minute in a film????
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:42 pm
And before you start on salaries- crickets chirping when Brad Pitt and other leftist actors makes $20 million for appearing in a 90 minute film....yet liberals only see corporate officers as greedy! Why does my brother only make a couple of hundred dollar
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:40 pm
companies. Its a rebirthing process, and its funny how liberals excoriate this healthy process... yet we hear the crickets chirping when unions kill Hostess bakeries.... hypocrisy from the left!
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:38 pm
Through this process, having been bought by financial holding companies. In some cases, they merge them with similar companies, combine product lines, eliminate what does not make money and in some cases, subdivisions get spun off and sold to other
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 2:37 pm
that's funny how you call it that. They rescued a lot of companies, Bain did not have a perfect track record, but for every company you name that eventually went bankrupt 2 or more succeeded due to Bain. I have a lot of suppliers who have been
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 1:00 pm
I can't wait to see what distraction you come up with for this one.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:44 pm
So, no proof then? Just more empty accusations? Good job arnnatz.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:21 pm
Wow, I suppose you don't have any proof for this accusation either?
arnnatz - November 18, 2012, 12:05 pm
how original, but considering that your postings are almost exclusively headlines from Daily KOS, I expected nothing less from you
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:54 am
TRANSLATION: I can't read, so I didn't see ***** from ********** who those comments were in response to. But my inflated ego make me think everyone is responding to me.
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:53 am
I don't see it anywhere in that article you provided arnnatz.
arnnatz - November 18, 2012, 11:52 am
was that comment aimed at me or cranky?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:52 am
Or are we supposed to use republican logic now, and just ignore the existence of this poster?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 11:51 am
JG, didn't you just smugly point to Romney and use him as your example for why logic defies the liberal mind, selectively ignoring his track record of bankrupting american companies?
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 10:56 am
just saying that his pointing to Romney is like the pot calling the kettle cookware... so stop being so smug and selective in your crtiticisms.
arnnatz - November 18, 2012, 9:32 am
You might want to try reading before you post: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/14/business/government-ownership-and-gm-regulation-dont-mix.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 1:09 am
Obama sits on the board at GM? News to me...
JGalt - November 18, 2012, 12:43 am
Obama's bailout of GM resulted in massive outsourcing to China. Why so selectively blind to facts?
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:36 am
crankyhead - November 18, 2012, 12:36 am
Republican logic: Ignore Romney's track record of outsourcing and vulture capitalism and hold him up against millionaires who have actually employ other Americans.


Liberal Logic: Killing Babies Is Good, Killing Terrorists Is Bad -


TAGS: obama liar liberal lies logic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by spyderlady

KALKAM - October 28, 2012, 10:48 pm

Liberal Logic -



LIBERAL LOGIC - No wonder we're in the shape we're in. Yes, lie-berals really are that stupid



TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - January 20, 2013, 8:24 pm
thank-Q 1 point sniper for proving liberals are dunces!

BUDGET DEFICIT - At least we're not "Broke-Broke"


LOGIC - Definitely not a tenant of Conservatism.

Crazy Commiefornia Environmentalists -

TAGS: liberal logic california delta smelt epa democrat created dust bowl san joaquin valley nancy pelosi barbara boxer governor moonbeam jerry brown radical environmentalists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Mooooooooooooooooooo - April 22, 2015, 7:27 pm

The boss is just trying some stuff out.
rebeccaolsen - April 22, 2015, 12:24 pm
It is just me or does everything look different than before? Makeover? Did politifake get a facelift?

Liberal America -

Liberal Hypocrisy -

Liberal Science Deniers -

PRINTING MORE MONEY DIDN'T WORK.. - So now we need to print more money! (Liberal logic in a nutshell)

TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - September 10, 2012, 6:48 am
Bull - September 9, 2012, 11:08 pm
I think we need to go back to the way it used to be when we backed up our currency with gold. (though I've got to admit I don't really understand much about currency) Wasn't that guy one of those private sector douches? Yeah, fire his ...
WTFO - September 9, 2012, 10:46 pm
This guy needs to be fired, period.

those selfish democrats -


2 STARBUCKS IN STARBUCKS DRINKING STARBUCKS - Liberal arguments are like this photo- cute, trendy, nostalgic, but largely irrelevant to the topic at hand.

LIBERAL LOGIC - even their tin foil hats can't protect them

LIBERAL LOGIC - They support the Secretary of Treasury and Senators with their tax violations, but are against tax breaks for the rich. Go figure.

ATHEISM - Because science cannot prove or disprove God, believing there is no God requires one to believe in something unprovable.

Liberals -

MITT ROMNEY - worth $250 million it would be okay if he made that money in movies or music

ERIC HOLDER - will blow in a breathalyzer if you promise to drop DWI charges

Liblogic -

TAGS: liblogic fails
Rating: 4.88/5

More politifakes by JGalt

crankyhead - August 4, 2013, 12:38 pm
Not a stretch. You asked for A name, I provided it. Mark Todd. He sh** that Hasan guy. With live rounds. Not that difficult to understand.
crankyhead - August 4, 2013, 12:32 pm
I'm not asking about people with jobs. I'm not asking about students. I'm asking you to show me where it is you get the idea that 'millions and millions of unemployed simply stopped looking for work.'
StoneTools - August 3, 2013, 8:39 pm
The remaining 1.4 million persons marginally attached to the labor force in July had not searched for work for reasons such as school attendance or family responsibilities. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
StoneTools - August 3, 2013, 8:39 pm
Among the marginally attached, there were 988,000 discouraged workers in July, up by 136,000 from a year earlier.
StoneTools - August 3, 2013, 8:38 pm
StoneTools - August 3, 2013, 8:15 pm
that's an awfully big stretch even for you. The fact is that they had pistols and were neither heavily armed nor surrounding hasan. Next try with the "ooooo shiny!"
crankyhead - August 3, 2013, 6:54 pm
...is ask you which page of that report the quote you are trying to attribute to it, is on, because I couldn't find it anywhere.
crankyhead - August 3, 2013, 6:53 pm
JG, I'm not even going to point out the irony of you using a congressional budget office document to prove an a**ertion, after having spent the last 5 years of your life criticizing congressional budgets, and those in that office. All I'm going to do...
crankyhead - August 3, 2013, 6:49 pm
Prove the statistic is skewed. That's all you have to do to change my mind. I'm not some idiot conservative who refuses to acknowledge facts if they're put in front of me. So put them in front of me. Show me the proof. Pretty simple, really.
crankyhead - August 3, 2013, 6:47 pm
Nice of you to let everyone know that you think MP's aren't soldiers. Showing off that monopoly again, huh? At least you're not in here impersonating a soldier, that would truly be embarrassing.
JGalt - August 3, 2013, 9:20 am
from the CBO: the past three years of high unemployment... the highest since the Great Depression... Hmmmm crankyhead needs to likewise take his differences up with the CBO as well....
StoneTools - August 3, 2013, 8:01 am
StoneTools - August 3, 2013, 7:58 am
OK, Now I get your stupidity. A police officer with a police revolver is considered heavily armed soldiers surrounding a shooter.
crankyhead - August 2, 2013, 9:55 am
Excuse me: "...who decided to stop looking for work."
crankyhead - August 2, 2013, 9:55 am
Also, I'm still waiting for proof of the 'millions of americans who decided to stop eating'.
crankyhead - August 2, 2013, 9:53 am
Actually ST, I provided the name he asked for. If you were paying attention to the conversation, you would know this. But alas, you own the monopoly on ignorance, as you've previously stated, so carry on.
KaBoom - August 1, 2013, 2:17 pm
If we stick with the apple example, if you had 6 full apples and six apple slices...U3 would say there are 12 apples and U6 would say there are 6.The only logical view then is to consider both of the measures within context as neither tells the full story
StoneTools - July 31, 2013, 6:38 pm
you lost what miniscule credibility you had when you claimed to be making a point.
StoneTools - July 31, 2013, 6:36 pm
and foxrecon is still waiting for some proof of hasan being surrounded by heavily armed soldiers
crankyhead - July 31, 2013, 10:22 am
Also, I'm still waiting on some proof of the millions of americans who decided they don't want to work anymore. I suspect I'll be waiting a while. Or, y'know, forever.
crankyhead - July 31, 2013, 10:20 am
...employed, towards your total number of UNEMPLOYED people, doesn't prove the inflated totals you'd like to believe are the 'REAL' numbers.
crankyhead - July 31, 2013, 10:18 am
The point I'm making, and the point I will continue to make, until you can grasp it, is this: Partial employment, is not the same as unemployment. It is disingenuous to pretend otherwise. Counting employed people, even the marginally or partially...
crankyhead - July 31, 2013, 10:16 am
I don't know how to dumb down my argument any further than counting apples in a bag JG. Also, I never said U3 was more accurate than any other number. You said it. Now you're trying to persuade other to believe that I said it. Hypocrite much?
StoneTools - July 30, 2013, 12:02 am
Nice, you are the master of evading completely answering a question.
JGalt - July 29, 2013, 11:40 pm
on this topic as well as your unwilingness to discuss the topic like an adult. You don't like the facts, so you pull out the refutations without substantiation. Still waiting to hear how U3 dropping uneemployed is more accurate than any other number...
JGalt - July 29, 2013, 11:39 pm
still waiting for Crank to address this in his insistence that U3 is the most correct statistic of them all, while many of us realize that the changes to dilute U3 to make unemployment sound better than it really is...
JGalt - July 29, 2013, 11:37 pm
your unsubstantiated refutations do not make you correct, nor have you put forth any logic to support your favorite skewed statistic as the one that is most correct. Your unwillingness to discuss the validity of all the numbers shows your lack of depth
crankyhead - July 29, 2013, 12:05 pm
Seeing as how internet ads use your browsing history to streamline advertizements that are tailor-made for the consumer operating the computer, if I was you, I'd maybe stop complaining about all the 'diarrhea ads', and just go see a doctor already.
Renza - July 29, 2013, 8:25 am
Sounds like it's better than reading all the fundy threads around, it feels like you're stuck in the movie idiocracy.
StoneTools - July 28, 2013, 2:11 pm
I just love reading your comments ... it's so much like going to cracked.com without all the needed ads for diarhea medicine.
crankyhead - July 28, 2013, 1:53 pm
My unwillingness to believe unsubstantiated claims, is not illogical JG.
crankyhead - July 28, 2013, 1:52 pm
Yes, well, those on the right who are allergic to reality keep claiming that there are millions of americans who just decided they didn't want to eat anymore, so they stopped looking for work, yet none of you can provide any documentaion to support this.
crankyhead - July 28, 2013, 1:50 pm
The rest of us will have to take your word for it ST, you are, after all, the expert on moronic, off kilter statements.
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:24 pm
in the same month (layoffs, etc) This also skews the outlook.
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:23 pm
If the truth mattered, they total employment should also be published to show how many jobs have been created or eliminated as well. The government only likes to talk about how many jobs were created without talking about how many were eliminated
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:22 pm
Maybe to satisfy Crank's a**ertion that the numbers are so overly cooked, the difference between U4 and U6 should be a different color to show how much of the graph is due to people who are only making half of their salary, living with their parents, etc
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:20 pm
as well as Persons employed part time for economic reasons (they want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule)
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:19 pm
U6, on the other hand, is the broadest measure of Unemployment: It includes those people counted by U3, plus marginally attached workers (not looking, but want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past),
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:18 pm
U3 is now comprised in a way that merely repeating it without a slew of caveats borders on fraud.
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:17 pm
USED to go into how the US reported unemployment. Hence, there has been a gradual decrease in the Unemployment rate that has occurred regardless of what was happening in the Jobs market.
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:17 pm
U3 is the “official unemployment rate” according to the BLS website. Due to this, it is the current measure of Unemployment that gets focused upon by most media, and therefore the public. It has, over the years, slowly excluded many of the factors that US
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:14 pm
right- while u6 is a better feel for the economy, neither number accounts for the contraction of jobs as a percentage of US population
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:12 pm
I would agree that u3 represents 7.6% that are collecting an unemployment check, but Crankyhead refuses to admit that there are unemployed who have become ineligible to collect an unemployment check because u3 is the "real" number and all others are false
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:10 pm
by definition u3 also includes employed people in the mix. that's how you get a percentage.
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:05 pm
not sure where that 17 came from, it was supposed to be "7". Under u3, the folks ineligible to collect unemployment who are still unemployed are no longer counted as unemployed. That is where your logic fails in this discussion.
JGalt - July 27, 2013, 2:03 pm
Crank, your the one who needs schooling. The government likes to claim that (under u3) that there are only 17 rotten apples in the barrel because 7 of them have been removed, but they still claim its a percentage of 100 apples instead of 93
StoneTools - July 27, 2013, 12:05 pm
that has to be the most moronic, off kilter thing that you've ever posted cranky.
crankyhead - July 27, 2013, 11:16 am
Time to maybe stop hiding behind the ever quotable: 'Do the math', when clearly, even when the math is being done, you can't grasp it.
crankyhead - July 27, 2013, 11:15 am
...a percentage, you have 14% rotten apple. Still with me? Now lets say that it turns out that 2 or 3 of those rotten apples, are NOT actually rotten. Following your logic, you would now claim that the % of rotten apples is higher than 14%. WTF?
crankyhead - July 27, 2013, 11:13 am
JG, speaking of tilting at windmills, I'm beginning to suspect you'd prefer to be referred to a Mr. Quixote. In any case, I'll simplify it for you further. You have a bag with 100 apples in it. Someone claims that 14 of those apples are rotten. As....
crankyhead - July 27, 2013, 11:11 am
Yes I do.
JGalt - July 24, 2013, 9:45 pm
u6 counts workers that stopped looking for work, which u3 does not count. so for the sake of you just shooting holes for the sake of it- which U do you think best represents the real picture??? present some support for it as well! We're waiting...
JGalt - July 24, 2013, 9:43 pm
not fully counting. I guess we'll agree to disagree. My argument still stands that a higher unemployment number that does count people with part time jobs even still being higher than U3 is still a more accurate number. do the math Crank,
JGalt - July 24, 2013, 9:42 pm
Many of us believe that U3 is more seriously under-representing the facts moreso than the u6,since it only counts a portion of unemployed. However, you tilt at windmills only to state that u6 is wrong without acknowledging that real unemployment is
OTC - July 24, 2013, 4:28 pm
Try the internet, cank
StoneTools - July 24, 2013, 12:15 pm
that applies to both 57587 and 57588
StoneTools - July 24, 2013, 12:14 pm
do you have a link to support that hallucination?
StoneTools - July 24, 2013, 12:13 pm
and U-3 is merely the number of people drawing unemployment checks. Once that runs out, they are no longer counted. Yet you cite that as a credible number. Your position is indefensible
crankyhead - July 24, 2013, 11:55 am
OTC, tell me where it is I can find the data you're quoting.
crankyhead - July 24, 2013, 11:54 am
U-6 is a percentage based number. You remove the employed from the total, and the number shrinks, JG. Please tell me how it is a 'scientist' gets to be 'CFO' of their own 'factory', without being able to understand basic math?
JGalt - July 22, 2013, 12:00 am
That is a 'record' high rate of unemployment.......
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 11:59 pm
54 months and counting...
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 11:59 pm
Oh, BTW Crankyhead- O does indeed holds a record for the longest stretch for > 7.5% unemployment, just to clarify your comment about 'the record'
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 11:56 pm
Cranky listen to yourself. If those numbers were not inlcluded, logic would dictate that U6 would be even higher. Since u6 is already higher than u3, your argument fails.....and loudly.
OTC - July 21, 2013, 6:27 pm
Unemployment hasn't reached the low when obama took office, and it only measures people 'actively' looking for a job, not the millions who stopped looking.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 6:27 pm
If you have 12 apples on a table and 6 fall on the floor, according to U-3 type logic, you have 6 apples.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 6:22 pm
involuntary part timers if you wish) the fact is that 7.6% is only people who are drawing unemployment and is a idiotic number to quote.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 6:21 pm
involuntarily part-time workers (number of people who's hours have been drastically cutback involuntarily), 1 million discouraged workers (stopped looking for a job because they believe there aren't any) If you add those numbers (leave out the
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 6:17 pm
That is most certainly not a wrap up. U-3 does not include people who have exceeded the 99 weeks of unemployment compensation (~1.4 million people). The participation rate of americans in the labor force is down to 63.5%, 8.2 million americans are
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 5:37 pm
So, to wrap it up in a bow, or come full circle in this discussion, since when is 7.6% unemployment a record high?
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 5:36 pm
...does include employed people in it's totals.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 5:36 pm
Please note; I'm not disagreeing that the U-6 data is useless, or that it doesn't provide an insight into the health of the economy, I'm just saying that it's not an accurate representation of 'REAL' unemployment, based solely on the fact that it...
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 5:33 pm
...to be people out there you can sucker into believing you have 12 apples, but that still doesn't make it true.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 5:32 pm
Exactly JG. The U-6 number includes people who are employed. Quoting the U-6 data as being the 'REAL' unemployment numbers is like having 6 apples and 6 oranges, but trying to convince people you actually have 12 apples. Of course, there are going...
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 5:13 pm
In your own quoted source: Includes marinally attached.... and those working part time fro economic reasons. (hint that means sick economy) hence why U6 is a more true measure of the health of the US economy.U3 will look better long before u6 does.
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 5:11 pm
fall off the unemployment elegibility roster.... despite the fact that u6 also includes underemployed-
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 5:10 pm
The fact still remains that the u6 is a more true measure of the health of the economy. U3 drops out those who have given up looking for work after their benefits run out..... by default, no job recovery can lead to a recovery in U3 when the unemployed
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 3:58 pm
Why would I apologize to anyone at Ft. Hood? Most of them would agree with me.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 3:57 pm
Sergeant Mark Todd. Satisfied? Does this mean you're going to go learn what the term cognitive dissonance means? Doubt it.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 3:45 pm
let me qualify that: you haven't name or displayed a link to a single heavily armed soldier surrounding hasan during the shooting.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 3:43 pm
your poster is unfounded bull****, but nothing less than I would expect from a liberal.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 3:42 pm
you still haven't named, or shown link to a picture of, a single heavily armed soldier that was either present or surrounding hasan. You could apologize to the soldiers at Ft Hood or you can continue spreading the liberal lies you spewed. Either way, you
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 2:04 pm
No, he's asking me to qualify a statement I didn't make. I refuse to breathe further life into his lunacy, by pretending as though the things he makes up, are real.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 1:58 pm
Correction: *The opposite of employed....*
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 1:57 pm
The opposite of unemployed is not under-employed, it is unemployed. Let me know if you're still confused.
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 1:00 pm
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 1:00 pm
I just looked up your poster and it says: ... SURROUNDED BY heavily armed soldiers. Yet, now you claim you said "were PRESENT"
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 12:56 pm
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 12:56 pm
and where, in relation to the shooter, were these "heavily armed men"? Fox has been asking for some time for a single name of one of the heavily armed soldiers, but you still fail to answer him. Is that because it's just another of your famed rectal
StoneTools - July 21, 2013, 12:51 pm
people with part time jobs, for the most part, are not employed, they are under employed. If you still have trouble understanding, just go to your local junior college and ask someone who can drop it down to your level.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 12:04 pm
I never said heavily armed soldiers were KILLED at Ft. Hood, I said heavily armed soldiers were PRESENT at Ft. Hood. Do try to pay attention Waldo.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 12:02 pm
Fox, you have a citation that supports this, I a**ume?
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 11:59 am
Let me know if you get stuck on this obviously confusing detail, I'll do what I can to clarify it further.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 11:58 am
Now let's see if you guys can follow the logic here: People with part time jobs, are employed.
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 11:56 am
From your link JG: "The U6 unemployment rate counts not only people without work seeking full-time employment (the more familiar U-3 rate), but also counts "marginally attached workers and those working part-time for economic reasons."
crankyhead - July 21, 2013, 11:54 am
The U-6 number includes some employed people in it's total. Ergo, the U-6 number is not the 'REAL' unemployment number, or do you guys not understand logic?
JGalt - July 21, 2013, 10:37 am
OTC - July 20, 2013, 7:25 pm
Unemployment has been a lot higher under obama, so canky is correct, 7.6% is not the record high for this administration.
JGalt - July 20, 2013, 7:16 pm
deal... Lets talk on the other hand- where can one find graphs about total employement? No- you can't. The government does not want us to know that full time workers are outnumbered by those on public a**istance!
JGalt - July 20, 2013, 7:14 pm
?cherry pick- that's a stretch C. Everyone in the US that has a working brain knows that the US gov't cherry picks the data they portray as good (even the CPI is cherry picked to show a lower inflation rate.) Everyone knows that the U6 is the real

OBAMA LOGIC - Because extending unemployment benefits creates more jobs than working on pipeline projects! Sounds like he's been chumming too much with Nancy!

Applying Liberal logic..... -

YOU CAN LEAD A LIBERAL TO LOGIC AND FACTS... - but you can't make them think

TAGS: logic
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - February 2, 2013, 6:24 pm
drink the kool aid as it were... from the daily KOS, the liberal sound bytes for the A.D.D. Dems
Doggit - February 2, 2013, 12:21 pm
Nice one

WE DON'T UNDERSTAND - Why liberals find fault with this premise

LOGIC - Not their strong point

TAGS: gop logic
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:39 am
This is statistics based on the highest number of people collecting, not some shell game where higher salaries and taxes twist the facts that richer states do sometimes subsidize the poorer states, just like those working for a living subsidize those not
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:37 am
15. Oregon % of pop. on a**istance: 1.55% 2007 spending: $83.85 million Total recipients (July 2008): 58,831 % Change in past 12 months: +27.2% Unemployment (May 2009): 12.4%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:37 am
13. Michigan % of pop. on a**istance: 1.65% 2007 spending: $380.93 million Total recipients (July 2008): 164,589 % Change in past 12 months: -4.8% Unemployment (May 2009): 14.1%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:37 am
13. Michigan % of pop. on a**istance: 1.65% 2007 spending: $380.93 million Total recipients (July 2008): 164,589 % Change in past 12 months: -4.8% Unemployment (May 2009): 14.1%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:36 am
12. Rhode Island % of pop. on a**istance: 1.79% 2007 spending: $57.4 million Total recipients (July 2008): 18,839 % Change in past 12 months: N/A Unemployment (May 2009): 12.1%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:36 am
10. New Mexico % of pop. on a**istance: 1.83% 2007 spending: $58.87 million Total recipients (July 2008): 36,322 % Change in past 12 months: +20% Unemployment (May 2009): 6.5%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:36 am
10. New Mexico % of pop. on a**istance: 1.83% 2007 spending: $58.87 million Total recipients (July 2008): 36,322 % Change in past 12 months: +20% Unemployment (May 2009): 6.5%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:36 am
9. Washington % of pop. on a**istance: 1.86% 2007 spending: $265.88 million Total recipients (July 2008): 121,864 % Change in past 12 months: 18.4% Unemployment (May 2009): 9.4%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:35 am
8. Minnesota % of pop. on a**istance: 1.88% 2007 spending: $106.29 million Total recipients (July 2008): 98,028 % Change in past 12 months: 5.9% Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:35 am
7. New York % of pop. on a**istance: 1.92% 2007 spending: $1.47 billion Total recipients (July 2008): 373,305 % Change in past 12 months: 1.2% Unemployment (May 2009): 8.2%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:35 am
6. District of Columbia % of pop. on a**istance: 1.99% 2007 spending: $18.67 million Total recipients (July 2008): 11,806 % Change in past 12 months: -6.3% Unemployment (May 2009): 10.7%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:35 am
5. Vermont % of pop. on a**istance: 2.02% 2007 spending: $30.92 milliion Total recipients (July 2008): 12,543 % Change in past 12 months: 7.3% Unemployment (May 2009): 7.3%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:34 am
3. Tennessee % of pop. on a**istance: 2.15% 2007 spending: $91.28 million Total recipients (July 2008): 133,505 % Change in past 12 months: 5.7% Unemployment (May 2009): 10.7%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:34 am
3. Tennessee % of pop. on a**istance: 2.15% 2007 spending: $91.28 million Total recipients (July 2008): 133,505 % Change in past 12 months: 5.7% Unemployment (May 2009): 10.7%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:34 am
2. Maine % of pop. on a**istance: 2.37% 2007 spending: $61.73 million Total recipients (July 2008): 31,148 % Change in past 12 months: 5.3% Unemployment (May 2009): 8.3%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:33 am
#1 welfare state: California % of pop. on a**istance: 3.30% 2007 spending: $3.28 billion Total recipients (July 2008): 1,212,893 % Change in past 12 months: 10.4% Unemployment (May 2009): 11.5%
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:31 am
Hmmm where are higher salaries paid, NY, California or Alabama?

Conservative Logic -

TAGS: conservatives logic
Rating: 2.23/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - May 7, 2013, 1:21 pm
Comparing anyone to the abusers of a system is a convenient excuse that completely ignores how the wealthy pay lower tax rates than the working class. Carlin is exactly correct that it is the message presented.
Oyster - May 7, 2013, 9:54 am
No, it's as simple as money earned vs money given.
Renza - May 7, 2013, 7:40 am
that sounds like an excuse to buy some time
Oyster - May 7, 2013, 6:21 am
That whole quote is way too easy to break apart, but I have neither the time nor desire right now.

Liberal Logic -

IF OBAMA IS THE ANSWER - The question was stupid!

ATTENTION LIBERALS - There is always time to stop listening to the lies of main street media and to stop drinking the Soros Kool-Aid, so you can think for yourselves.

AMERICAN LOGIC - It's an oxymoron, moron.

Scapegoat -

liberal logic -

if we have nothing to hide... -

Applied Logic 101 -

ERIC HOLDER - will take the test if he doesn't have to pay child support the mother is a racist he is protected under executive privilege

'Health insurance is a right." -

ERIC HOLDER - Will turn in his tax returns only if you promise not to prosecute.

CAMPAIGN RHETORIC - would look like this if a liberal was running Romney's campaign

TAGS: liblogic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - September 10, 2012, 6:48 am
arnnatz - September 9, 2012, 11:21 pm
No need to reveal sources, it's gotta be true

Liberals: -

WAIT, WHAT? - According to that newspaper's map of gun owners You're supposed to be unarmed!

ALREADY BARRED FROM OWNING GUNS - Gun laws don't mean jack to those who want to harm others. Liberal logic fails once again!

TAGS: lib logic failure again
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

PapaFox - December 30, 2012, 9:17 am
And closing the gun show loophole STILL doesn't prevent law-abiding citizens from owning a gun. That's propaganda spread by the gun industry any time something threatens their profits.
Ron2 - December 30, 2012, 5:06 am
Really? A horse **** argument? naiveness isn't cute in grownups. And well regulated does not mean remove. Nice try but no cookies.
PapaFox - December 29, 2012, 8:24 am
"If every single gun were taken out of the hands of civilians" is a horsesh*t argument. Closing the gun show loophole doesn't prevent law-abiding citizens from owning a gun.
Jrock - December 29, 2012, 7:55 am
The problem is these weapons have been proliferated throughout our society. It has become too easy to get a gun.
Jrock - December 29, 2012, 7:53 am
What part of "well regulated" don't you understand?
Ron2 - December 28, 2012, 6:34 am
What part of "shall not infringe" is not clear? If every single gun were taken out of the hands of civilians, aside from the obvious dictatorship we would be placed in, people would find other ways to murder multiple people, like, home-made bombs.
Texmil - December 26, 2012, 7:41 pm
Actually, I don't mind fixing 1) I think there is a need to do so. As for 2), the definition of a**ault rifle is vague. By military standards, an a**ault rifle is fully automatic. None of these were. They looked like a**ault rifles, but were s*dsemi-auto.
crankyhead - December 26, 2012, 2:23 pm
Once again, logic destroys rhetoric. I never get tired of watching that happen either.
PapaFox - December 26, 2012, 11:49 am
Proof again that 1) the gaping loophole for private sales should be closed, and 2) there's no place for a**ault rifles in the hands of civilians.

IF HANK... - Then Bob...

TAGS: logic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - December 9, 2012, 6:51 pm
abuse of position- hes a aports commentator, not a political a***yst.
crankyhead - December 9, 2012, 11:50 am
Why would Bob have to go?

LIBERAL LOGIC - Yeah, it really is that convoluted

Liberals -

TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - February 21, 2014, 12:10 am
I guess hypberbole humor is lost on this crowd.
JGalt - February 21, 2014, 12:08 am
in case anyone has not been paying attention, with all the money being printed the last few years, we're ripe for hyperinflation.... Hmmmm
JGalt - February 21, 2014, 12:07 am
I can see I really touched a raw nerve here- straight to the name calling.... liberals sure hate logic and facts
JGalt - February 21, 2014, 12:07 am
which is why the CBO indicates that there would be a loss of jobs from that move yesterday
fauxnews - February 20, 2014, 10:26 pm
You havent a clue about "simple economic theory." Supply vs. demand.When corporations flex their muscle,people close their wallets in many cases. That saying: don't negotiate with terrorists? Fear of what the corps might do is anti-democratic.Period,idiot
fauxnews - February 20, 2014, 10:24 pm
Yet, the reality is that prices WOULD go up. I suppose the dollar menu would probably be replaced by the $2 menu. Big whoop. The Big Mac might shoot up from $4 to $5. GOD FORBID! That's a 25% to 50% of price. But to us, acceptable. JGalt = JGullible
fauxnews - February 20, 2014, 10:21 pm
REALITY FAIL. The real joke of this poster is the delusion. People don't NEED McDonald's. McDonalds needs us more than we need junk food. If they did raise their prices THAT much, guess what? Nobody would buy. And we'd survive JUST dandy without junk food
Curlyrocks - February 20, 2014, 8:59 pm
are in fact leaching there wealth from the economy rather than helping it by producing something useful.
Curlyrocks - February 20, 2014, 8:59 pm
Shut up JGalt, liberals don't want to hear about how their new marketing firm, web design firm, or online business isn't actually helping to create wealth for any one other than themselves . And they're certainly not interested in hearing about how they


GMA - would like to thank Jeffery Zucker for making it the highest rated morning TV show

Liberal Logic -

BAN THE BRIT - white house petition to send Piers Morgan back to the Brits succeeds!

TAGS: ban the brit limey logic fail smug limey brit bull**** limey logic
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by JGalt

PapaFox - December 26, 2012, 12:42 pm
Oh? Which liberals are calling for deportations of people for their opinions? And who do they want to deport?
JGalt - December 26, 2012, 12:34 pm
And to think Liberals say such outlandish things every day... yet Liberals call for the heads of NRA members on a pike... and no one calls them to task for it.
PapaFox - December 26, 2012, 12:14 pm
2) "This is unlawful. The First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves." - Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
PapaFox - December 26, 2012, 12:13 pm
1) "When Government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control thought. ..."
PapaFox - December 26, 2012, 12:13 pm
Deport him for saying that the Gun Owners of America executive director is a stupid man? In the opinion of many Americans, Morgan is right. What's next, banning newspapers or magazines from other countries that say things you don't like?

Liberal Abortion Logic -

Libtard Science Logic 101 -

LIBERAL LOGIC - using private funds to insult Islam bad using tax dollars to insult Christianity okay

JOB STEALING ATM'S - Obama says ATM's are the reason his "shovel ready" jobs aren't happening. Priceless.

ITS NOT MURDER - when the government does it! (Liberal logic)


TAGS: liberal logic
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by JGalt

Renza - February 12, 2013, 9:53 am
It's true, the monarchy may show up any day now to try and reclaim the colony.

Liberals -


TAGS: obamalogic
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - January 20, 2013, 8:21 pm
Than-Que 1 point sniper!


TAGS: lib logic fail
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by JGalt

fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 8:08 pm
Oh,I know you're very angry. I get that this whole situation pushes your b-uttons,big time.You don't need to remind us.As far as "kids" go,seeing as'you'are the one in a little timeout right now for not playing nicely,I'll consider the source ;-) Tissue?
fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 8:05 pm
Oh,I you're very angry. I get that this whole situation pushes your b-uttons, big time. You don't need to remind us. As far as "kids" go, seeing as 'you' are the one in a little timeout right now for not playing nicely...I'll consider the source. Tissue?
OTC - November 27, 2013, 7:54 pm
Hypocrisy comes to mind
fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 6:53 pm
desperate indeed, he logged in under a guest account, he must be X-D
crankyhead - November 27, 2013, 6:35 pm
Just out of curiosity OTC, why would I?
crankyhead - November 27, 2013, 6:34 pm
That's the big bad boogeyman trifecta you guys just blurted out. Must be getting desperate.
crankyhead - November 27, 2013, 6:33 pm
Bibsy, the only thing you've ever said to anyone in here has been some half witted ***ual innuendo. Which probably explains why you stopped participating so much, once folks actually started trying to have conversations.
fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 6:06 pm
OTC - November 27, 2013, 4:02 pm
Just out of curiosity, why didn't you mention fauxnews who answers questions directed to you?
fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 2:42 pm
Speaking of children... enjoying your time out! X-D
fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 12:21 pm
...certainly not those that put up the exchange website.lol...Sawdust maybe?
GrouchoMarxist - November 27, 2013, 6:36 am
Odd... everything I ever said about you and obozo turns out true... And you got the Big Gulp...
GrouchoMarxist - November 27, 2013, 6:35 am
Liberals don't use logic....
fauxnews - November 27, 2013, 12:13 am
"Always two, there are. No more. No less. A Master and an apprentice." — Master Yoda X-D
StoneTools - November 26, 2013, 1:24 am
More likely ailinsky or ayers
JGalt - November 25, 2013, 10:59 pm
Mr Soros himself?
OTC - November 25, 2013, 7:54 pm
I didn't realize asking a question was considered an answer to a troll
StoneTools - November 25, 2013, 9:46 am
and when he can't do that, he uses diversion and distraction - which is the liberal mantra
JGalt - November 24, 2013, 10:23 pm
the name calling- make the argument fit one of the daily KOS talking points- even when its a stretch, etc.
JGalt - November 24, 2013, 10:22 pm
Liberal sock puppets always learn from their masters.
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 8:34 pm
Who do you think taught me how to do that? =)
JGalt - November 24, 2013, 8:24 pm
listen to the pot calling the kettle cookware! From the one who always reads what is not written!
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 6:07 pm
You really should try to read responses, before a**uming you know what they say, carrot.
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 6:01 pm
You really should read comments before you comment on them.
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 6:00 pm
Can I point out something you said that had substance? No, carrot, that's my point.
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 5:56 pm
One that isn't a blatant line of crap
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 5:56 pm
Can you point one out?
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 5:52 pm
All the time. You should try it once in a while. I don't care what account you use to do it either.
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 5:51 pm
LOL You are one delusional little train wreck of a person, aren't you. "Tell it like it is" HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 5:47 pm
just out of curiosity, do you ever post anything that has any substance?
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 5:47 pm
I just tell it like it is. By the way, I find all of your lame attempts at discussion humorous and lacking in any substance or truthfulness
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 5:27 pm
Just out of curiosity, are you a humourless, spiteful little boy in real life too, or is that just your online persona?
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 5:25 pm
Just out of curiosity, do you ever think outside the box, or do you just shut the flaps, and talk to yourself in the dark all the time?
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 5:25 pm
Just out of curiosity, is your ideology so fragile, that it can't withstand being challenged?
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 5:20 pm
It's a thing that they are lacking: intelligence
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 5:18 pm
Just out of curiousity, why are you and fauxpas such trolls?
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 3:44 pm
Just out of curiosity, why is it when I ask JG a question, Stool-boy and OCD answer it?
OTC - November 24, 2013, 3:23 pm
M e t a p h o r*
OTC - November 24, 2013, 3:23 pm
Just out of curiosity, why doesn't the smartest liberal here not understand the me***hor?
StoneTools - November 24, 2013, 3:12 pm
Once again, cranky logic, can't understand the post, just wing it with something extremely ignorant. Good job libtard
crankyhead - November 24, 2013, 2:55 pm
Just out of curiosity, why do you believe that fire extinguishers are liberal?

ATTENTION LIBERALS - Does this tell you ANYTHING???????????????????????????

SCHOOL ZONES - We had this problem of reckless kids driving 90 mph through the school zone. So we lowered the speed limit from 25 to 20.


DEMOCRATS - Yeah, they really do think that way!

TAGS: lib logic
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by JGalt


LIBERAL LOGIC - Moonbats at their finest! Holding hands and singing Kumbaya ain't the answer to everything!

TAGS: liberal logic fail
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by JGalt

Renza - March 16, 2013, 10:31 am
that's right, usually stalkers, muggers, and rapists do announce themselves well before they try to attack you, there's clearly no reason why you shouldn't be aware well ahead of time. If it happens though, it's clearly gods will.
JGalt - March 15, 2013, 11:06 pm
pollyana mentality- first victim is Papa
JGalt - March 15, 2013, 11:05 pm
doofus- you should know if u are being stalked
JGalt - March 15, 2013, 11:05 pm
that's like the TV know it all liberal Bob Beckel what's his face that says ra** does not really exist on college campuses!!!
PapaFox - March 15, 2013, 9:21 pm
Don't worry, the rapist will give you plenty of time to pull your handgun out and shoot him.
Cannabal - March 15, 2013, 8:58 pm
Conservative Logic: "Pray to God, and He'll show you the way." Or, "Don't worry, the female body knows how to reject ra** pregnancies."

BUDGET SPEECH - Nothing about job creation, only incoherent speech. One thing's for sure: if we don't spend ourselves into oblivion, autistic children might suffer!!!

LIBERAL IDEOLOGY - Yeah, it really is that simple-


LIBERAL POLITICAL RALLY - Learning the day's sound byte,

Liberals -

TAGS: illogical
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - May 6, 2013, 6:03 am
except when you see the same thing happen so many times....its hard to claim a protected category of "isolated incident"
Rudedog - May 5, 2013, 5:41 pm
Although I agree with the message, the application of an isolated incident to proclaim a general ideology is sometimes inaccurate.

blah, blah, blah -

TAGS: obama scandals pathological politics government
Rating: 3.67/5

More politifakes by ChadAllen

Bandit5906 - May 1, 2014, 6:05 pm
Me, me, me, me, me, I

WE'VE ALREADY SEEN WHAT THEY DO WHEN ENTRUSTED WITH OUR MONEY... - if citizens cant be trusted to safely own assault weapons... why then do we trust the government to safely own them? the government is just a group of citizens...

"UNEMPLOYMENT CREATES JOBS" - Nancy's classic line last year certainly explains Liberals to a "T". Just as wrong then as they are now.

"UNEMPLOYMENT CREATES JOBS" - No, Nancy, actually "Unemployment" is not working....

BRAINWASHED MOONBATS - This is taken from the Democratic handbook. (I knew this document had to exist.. they all use this same tactic!)

LIBERAL SPIN... - When you look at the discussion comments in politifake, you begin to realize that the logic goes in circles...

LOSING THE PLOT - Right-wing nutters just don't get it.

DANGEROUS ? - Female organs are more dangerous than guns? Really?

TAGS: republican logic fail
Rating: 3.29/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Rudedog - January 18, 2013, 10:25 pm
Good one PFox

PRIORITIES - Yeah, they really are that perverse.

NEOCON LOGIC - Think it'll work?

TAGS: conservative logic
Rating: 3.17/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - March 27, 2013, 5:55 pm
We tried in 1812, and got our a**es kicked. :)
Cannabal - March 27, 2013, 5:51 pm
I can't wait until we liberate Canada from socialism.
Rudedog - March 26, 2013, 10:47 pm
DHS. Nicely put
rerun - March 26, 2013, 8:13 pm

absolutely love this.


TAGS: error 404 logic not found
Rating: 3.13/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

PapaFox - November 16, 2012, 8:41 pm
LOL I saw this in the news! McCain made SUCH an a** of himself that even the other Republicans are embarrassed to be seen with him. What a schmuck.